by
You will get efficient and thoughtful service from OUSHANG SOLAR.
Silicon solar cells of the type now used for almost every residential solar installation in Australia have been around for a long time. They are 64 years old. This makes them the same age as nuclear power generation. They&#;ve come a long way since they were first made at Bell Labs in the United States. Originally they were only able to convert around 6% of the energy in sunlight into electrical energy but now the most efficient solar panels on the market manage 22%.
Unfortunately, the days of large improvements in efficiency have long been over. Now we only see small incremental improvements and one of these in use that will be much more common in the future are panels that use half-cut solar cells. These panels are known as both half-cut and split-cell solar panels.
Luckily, explaining what half-cut solar cells are doesn&#;t involve complex scientific explanations involving quantum mechanics. They are literally normal solar cells that have been cut in half. Instead of having 60 solar cells, as most panels put on roofs do, they have 120 half-sized ones. This results in lower electrical resistance that improves efficiency. An additional benefit is half cut panels resist the effects of shade better than standard solar panels. This isn&#;t directly due to the cells being cut in half but because of the way they are wired together.
While the increase in efficiency is only small, several large manufacturers are convinced modern production techniques make half-cut solar cell panels worthwhile. At the moment REC Solar&#;s TwinPeak panels are the only half cut ones widely available in Australia, but with many large manufacturers either starting to produce them or planning to we will soon be spoiled for choice.
A conventional solar panel typically contains sixty 0.5V solar cells wired up in series. Voltages add in series, so this example solar panel operates at 30V.
If you cut a solar cell in half it will produce half as much current, but its voltage will stay the same.
You&#;ll also have twice as many of them so, if half-cut cells were wired together as in a standard panel, they would produce twice the voltage.
This would not be appreciated by installers using normal solar inverters or trying to stay within Australian standards for residential solar voltage.
To make their voltage similar to standard panels the half-cut cells are wired together differently. There are 2 lots of sixty series-connected cells that operate at 30V each. These two 30V halves are then connected in parallel. Voltages in parallel stay the same, so the panel remains at the standard 30V.
Why are panel manufacturers going to the trouble of cutting cells in half?
Two main reasons:
A standard solar panel has 3 strings. Thanks to bypass diodes (shown in red below), one small spot of shade on a panel, caused by, say, a leaf or bird poop, will knock one entire cell-string out of action, but not affect the others.
Standard panel shade behaviour
Here&#;s what happens on a standard solar panel. The current flow is shown in orange, with the bottom bypass diode activated:
Two-thirds of the cells are active, so you get approximately two-thirds of the power.
Half-cut panel shade behaviour
Instead of having 3 cell-strings like a standard solar panel, the half-cut panel has 6 cell strings making it a 6 string panel. One small spot of shade on a half-cut panel makes things interesting.
The current can either go through the bypass diode, in which case, only two-thirds of the cells are active &#; the same as a conventional panel:
The alternative path for the current is via string (3), avoiding the diode, in which case five-sixths of the cells are still active.
Half-cut shade performance depends on your inverter&#;s MPPT algorithm:
You need a good inverter to make the most of half-cut panels. They need to find just the right amount of current and voltage to either activate or not activate the bypass diodes, to get the most power from the particular pattern of shade on the panel at that moment in time.
To make the most of a half-cut/split-cell solar panel&#;s improved shade tolerance you need to use an inverter with &#;Global Maximum Tracking&#; MPPTs, so they don&#;t get stuck on the wrong power curve maximum. GSES&#;s excellent new video explains this really well:
For more information, please visit 120 Half Cell Photovoltaic Panel China.
Shade should encroach from the short edge
To get the shading benefit of half-cut panels, they should be oriented so that shade encroaches from the short end:
When one solar cell in a panel cell string is shaded, all the preceding unshaded cells can dump the energy they produce into the first shaded shaded cell as heat. This creates a hot spot that can potentially damage the solar panel if it lasts for a long time. Twice as many panel cell strings means only half as much heat, but as the shaded cell only has half the area to radiate heat as a normal cell, I&#;m not sure there will be much of an improvement. But the decreased total amount of heat produced should be less damaging to the panel so there is likely to be an improvement in resistance to hot spot damage.
Standard solar panels have one junction box that cables come out of located on the back of the panel near the top. Panels with half-cut solar cells can have junction boxes that are split into three, as you can see in this picture of a REC Twinpeak half-cut panel. The middle box is for the middle bypass diode.
At first, I thought that since the junction box, or boxes, were in the middle of the panel it made no difference which way up it was installed. But then I was reminded that one cable is positive and the other is negative and it&#;s probably best not to confuse them. While there is enough length in the cables to cross them over if necessary, the thought of doing that gives me the creeps. It is not an elegant solution.
I have read that half-cut cells are more resistant to the effects of heat and so won&#;t suffer as much of a decrease in efficiency when they get hot. And they will get hot if they have been installed properly, which is outside in the sun. But this may just be the result of the slightly higher efficiency of half cut panels causing more sunlight energy to be converted into electricity and less into heat. Looking at solar panel datasheets I can&#;t clearly see better heat tolerance compared to standard panels of similar efficiency. As information on more half-cut panels becomes available I might be able to arrive at a conclusion.
Half-cut panels aren&#;t new. They&#;ve probably been around ever since someone accidentally broke some cells and decided to wire them together anyway. Solar cells used to be incredibly expensive so it must have happened a long time ago.
But despite having some advantages, panels with half-cut solar cells also had some disadvantages that prevented them from being put into widespread production until now. These problems were:
Half-cut panels have the expense of cutting solar cells in half with a &#;laser&#;.
The laser that is used doesn&#;t even cut all the way through. It only puts a groove in the cell and then it&#;s snapped in two. This is apparently cheaper than just using a bigger laser.
Then there is the added expense of attaching twice as many cells to a panel and soldering twice as many connections. This would have resulted in a large increase in labour costs at the start of this decade when humans did most of this work by hand. Now it&#;s mostly done by machines that have lowered costs and improved reliability, so the increased cost per solar panel is not nearly as significant as it used to be and the reduced defect rate means half-cut panels can now pay for themselves.
Doubling the amount of soldering required doubles the chances of soldering defects. But apparently, modern automated soldering equipment is now so reliable this is no longer a serious problem and defects that do occur can hopefully be detected before the panel leaves the factory.
Solar cells can have internal defects that reduce their efficiency. If a defect is very small it may not have much effect, but if you cut a cell in half you effectively double the effect of the defect. But defects can be found with machinery or even visual inspection if it&#;s large enough.
These days machines can be taught to do visual inspections and, in the lab at least, they can do a better job of it than humans1.
At the moment, the only half-cut panels I know to be in widespread use in Australia are REC Solar&#;s TwinPeak panels. Canadian Solar has recently introduced its half-cut Ku panels into Australia but refer to them as Low Internal Current solar panels. I can only guess this is because someone told them that in this country, half-cut means pissed as a parrot. My understanding is Canadians became very careful about what words they use in Australia ever since they found out what we think of root beer.
Large manufacturers that will soon be producing half-cut panels include:
Jinko Solar is the world&#;s largest manufacturer of solar panels and a representative of the company told me they plan to convert the majority of their production to half-cut panels. But he also told me he only joined the company 3 weeks earlier, so I&#;m not confident he would even know the best place to sneak a nap let alone have a good grasp of the company&#;s future plans. But I freely admit this was my own fault. I had a clear choice. I could have spoken to the guy who knew what was going on or I could have spoken to the guy who knew English. I chose poorly. I should have rung up to the experienced guy and hit him over the head with Google Translate. Then I&#;d be able to confidently tell you that Jinko&#;s hovercraft is full of eels.
Because their issues with defects appear to have been resolved I would be fine with selecting a panel with half-cut solar cells over an otherwise identical standard panel because I would expect slightly more output from them thanks to their being better able to deal with shade.
Sign up for our weekly newsletter!
Your
Before going into the details, here is some background on the methodology and selection criteria: module efficiencies have been improving considerably in recent years. In order to make the list rewarding for technically advanced products, we set the minimum efficiency of 21.5% as the criterion to feature in the list. We have listed only commercially-available top modules from each cell technology stream of one module maker. For example, if a company is offering 2 different product streams based on PERC technology that have more than 21.5% efficiency, then only the product with the higher efficiency is considered for this list. But if a module maker is offering, for example, products based on PERC and TOPCon that have efficiencies of 21.5% or above, then both the products are listed. Efficiency is the only criterion for ranking in the list (whenever available in the specs, we have used 2 digits after the decimal point for efficiencies, otherwise one). However, as we see products with the same efficiency more often, power determines the order in this case. And when both the efficiency and power are the same, we list the manufacturers in an alphabetical order.
For more Durable Solar Panels OEMinformation, please contact us. We will provide professional answers.